A Walk in the Woods: Rediscovering America on the Appalachian Trail
by Bill Bryson
From Lit Lovers:
1. One of the most interesting aspects of this book is the unlikely friendship between Bryson and Katz. What is the relationship based on? Consider, especially, the episode in Maine when Katz gets lost: somehow the friendship is altered. How does Bryson’s attitude toward Katz change over the course of the book? How does Katz himself change? Or does he? What was Katz’s motivation, anyway, to walk the AT?
2. The book offers an excellent microscope through which to examine the meaning of friendship—our own friendships. Do the two men remind you of friends who tested your patience, but who exhibited intense loyalty?
3. In fiction a journey usually symbolizes a journey of self-discovery—at the end the protagonist comes to learn something about him/herself. Although A Walk isn’t a novel, do either of the men come to greater self-awareness by the end of their journey?
4. The tone of the book veers back and forth between humor and seriousness, even anger. In fact, the book is a sort of jeremiad against environmental threats to the great wilderness areas of the country. Is Bryson’s anger justified? He criticizes, but does he offer solutions? Are there solutions?
5. Katz pokes fun at rural Southerners, which some readers find funny, others find offensive. You?
6. Bryson ponders the attraction of hiking: ”You have no engagements, commitments, obligations, or duties; no special ambitions and only the smallest, least complicated of wants; you exist in a tranquil tedium, serenely beyond the reach of exasperation.” If you’re a hiker, backpacker, camper, are your experiences similar to or different from Bryson’s? For those who aren’t hikers, are there other avenues to “exist in a tranquil tedium”?
7. You might also talk about the numerous characters Bryson and Katz meet on the trail. Mary Ellen is one, for instance: how do you feel about their treatment of her?
A. What do you think of the title of the book, A Walk in the Woods: Rediscovering America on the Appalachian Trail?
B. What did you think of the scene where they discovered on a map that they had only hiked two inches of the four feet of trail?
C. Do you agree with the author’s statement, “If we couldn’t walk the whole trail, we also didn’t have to?”
D. Do you feel that their hike really counts as hiking the Appalachian Trail even though it was only 39% of the trail?
E. What do you think of the relationship between Bryson and Katz?
F. What about the interactions between them and the other characters in the book? Did you find the relationships humorous?
G. What do you think of the author’s sense of humour? His opinions? His writing style?
H. Do you think that readers could find this book offensive or controversial? In what ways?
I. What do you think of the informational tidbits/tangents on history (of the trail, of the National Park Service, etc.), geology (of Centralia and the mountainside in Lehigh Valley), ecology (the effects of global warming, zinc mining, dam building), and social customs (the interaction and views of different people) in the book? Did any ignite your interest? Which ones? Why?
J. Do you view these “asides” as positive or negative in the structure of the book?
K. Did the ending of the book “feel right” to you? What do you think the author meant about it not feeling right about cutting grass after hiking the Appalachian Trail?
L. In an interview with the author, Bryson mentioned that Katz said “Oh, Bryson, you know, it’s all bullshit, but it’s really funny!” In the same interview, Bryson said “Everything I say in the book is absolutely true.” What do you think?